![]() Also all the different ways of routing signals, the ability to work with DAW-controllers and the powerfull tools available (and the GUI) makes Cubase far more usable for me than the other DAWs mentioned. For me Cubase works far more intuitive than PTPA or RB. I use Cubase 5.5 and am completely satisfied with that DAW. I know a lot of people on a homerecording forum that use Cubase LE4 that haven't felt the need to upgrade to the full version. ![]() Chances are you won't run into the restrictions at all, at least not for the first year or two. If you decide to invest in an interface to improve your recordings and you get a powerful DAW for free to go with it, why wouldn't you usde it? It saves you money on a DAW (if you don't have one already) and you get a free chance to try out the program. The LE-version of Cubase is a very powerful DAW, even if it doesn't have all the features C5 has. and have suffixes such as "LE" appended to them are worth exactly what you paid for them.Ĭubase, especially, while having a rather large following, is not a very intuitive platform IMHO, hard to learn, hard to set up, hard to keep running from day to day IME. ![]() IMO most softwares that come included with things like soundcards, etc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |